The X post you linked from
@politvidchannel
(dated around January 22, 2026) is a "BREAKING" claim stating that a US Senator has officially called for President Trump's removal from office under the 25th Amendment to the US Constitution.The attached images (screenshots) show:
  • A headline/article snippet from The Hill reporting that Democratic Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) called for invoking the 25th Amendment.
  • The trigger was a reported text message from Trump to Norway's Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, where Trump linked his aggressive push to acquire/control Greenland (a Danish territory) to not winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump reportedly wrote something along the lines of:
    "Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America... The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland."
Markey posted on X (along with others like Reps. Yassamin Ansari, Sydney Kamlager-Dove, and Eric Swalwell) urging the 25th Amendment's use, arguing this showed unfitness or erratic behavior. Some called Trump "mentally ill" in this context.Context and reality check:
  • This stems from Trump's renewed (and escalated) interest in Greenland in his second term, including threats of tariffs on European allies/Denmark if they refuse to negotiate.
  • Multiple major outlets (The Hill, New York Times, Reuters, BBC, etc.) confirmed the text message exchange was real and leaked/released around January 19–20, 2026.
  • The 25th Amendment allows the VP + majority of the Cabinet (or Congress in some cases) to declare a president unable to discharge duties — but with Trump's loyal Cabinet, it's considered extremely unlikely to succeed (similar past attempts in his first term failed).
  • The post gained massive traction (millions of views, thousands of likes/retweets), with reactions ranging from strong support among critics to dismissal as partisan overreach.
If you'd like more details, the full text exchange, or related images explained, let me know!