Viral Spotlight: Analyzing Harley Fowler's Rise to Fame on X

 

BREAKING: AG Pam Bondi confirms an appeal is underway after a judge dismissed cases against James Comey and Letitia James.

“We’ll be taking all available legal action, including an immediate appeal, to hold them accountable.”

No one is above the law.
pic.twitter.com/2jPOJ9jNtT

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 24, 2025

The X post shares a video clip of Attorney General Pam Bondi announcing an immediate appeal after a federal judge dismissed indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York AG Letitia James, citing an unlawfully appointed special prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan.

These cases accused Comey of misconduct in the 2016 Russia probe and James of bias in her civil fraud case against Trump, underscoring the Trump administration's push to investigate prior political opponents.

Bondi's pledge to "hold them accountable" in the 45-second clip has sparked polarized replies, with supporters cheering potential justice and critics decrying it as retaliatory overreach, amassing over 22,000 likes and 33 million views within hours.

 

Lindsey Halligan's appointment as the interim United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia has been a focal point of controversy, leading to significant legal and political repercussions. Here are the details surrounding her appointment:

- **Appointment and Role**: Lindsey Halligan was appointed by President Donald Trump to serve as the acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. This appointment came after Trump pushed out the previous top prosecutor, who had expressed doubts about bringing charges against both James Comey and Letitia James. Halligan's role was to oversee these high-profile cases, which accused Comey of misconduct in the 2016 Russia probe and James of bias in her civil fraud case against Trump.

- **Legal Challenge**: The legitimacy of Halligan's appointment was challenged in court. On October 20, 2025, Comey's attorneys filed a motion for dismissal, alleging that Halligan's interim appointment violated federal law. This challenge was based on the argument that her appointment did not follow proper legal procedures.

- **Judicial Ruling**: U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled that Halligan's appointment was unlawful. This decision came after it was determined that her appointment did not comply with the requirements set forth in the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, which governs how acting officials can be appointed in the absence of a confirmed U.S. Attorney.

- **Retroactive Appointment**: In response to the legal challenges, Attorney General Pam Bondi retroactively appointed Halligan as a "special attorney" to address concerns about the legitimacy of her initial appointment. This move was intended to shore up the legal standing of the prosecutions she was overseeing.

- **Impact on Cases**: The ruling that Halligan's appointment was unlawful led to the dismissal of the cases against James Comey and Letitia James. This decision marked a significant setback for the Trump administration's efforts to investigate and potentially prosecute perceived political enemies.

- **Public and Political Reaction**: The dismissal of these cases and the controversy surrounding Halligan's appointment have sparked polarized reactions. Supporters of Trump view the initial charges as necessary accountability, while critics see them as retaliatory overreach. The situation has heightened tensions around the use of the Department of Justice for political purposes.

Halligan's appointment and the subsequent legal battles highlight the complex interplay between political appointments, legal procedures, and the pursuit of justice, especially in high-stakes political environments.